🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest is no longer a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or withhold at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the current government is putting forward, which would determine when and where protests can take place, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already weakened this essential right: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on freedom have practically abolished the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The most recent limitations are being justified by citing last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a pretext to suppress dissent is not only disconnected to that responsibility but distorts it.

"If you cannot set boundaries at genocide, you probably cannot draw the line at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the rights of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In today's complex situation, here's what's actually happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on arms sales to the state, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Ministers have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the actions of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from 24 months of ongoing violence that have taken many thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of discrimination in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for holding signs against mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those arrested are pensioners; including a retired priest and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the sitting leader described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors struggled, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how easily we allowed them to slip away.