🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned decision, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to use a revised congressional district plan that is projected to include as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to set aside a district court's block that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Justices' Rationale

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and upsetting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

The district court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters according to their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to employ the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

With a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a violation of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling comes amid a national contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican hold. Usually, map-drawing occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add several additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with new maps in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party officials criticized the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

A senior House leader stated the court had another time shredded its standing by upholding a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.